Ontario’s Not-for-Profit Corporations Act, 2010 Now in Force

On October 19, 2021, the Ontario Not-for-Profit Corporations Act, 2010 (the “Act”) came into force.  There is a three-year transition period from October 19, 2021 for not-for-profit corporations to make required changes to their governing documents.

Application

The Act does not apply to the following:

  • Insurance corporations under Part V of the Corporations Act;
  • Corporations without share capital that fall under the Co-operative Corporations Act;
  • When a statute clearly says otherwise; and
  • Companies with social purposes, like share-capital social clubs, such as some golf, tennis or country clubs. These companies will still be governed by the Corporations Act if incorporated or continued under that Act.  However, within a five-year transition period, they must continue either as a:

The Act applies to not-for-profit corporations incorporated under special or private acts, though some exceptions apply.

New Features

There are a number of new features in the Act, including those briefly summarized below.

  • The incorporation process for new not-for-profits is more efficient. Charitable corporation incorporation no longer requires the approval of the Office of the Public Guardian and Trustee.
  • There are clearer rules for governing the corporation and increasing accountability.
    • Members have actions available to them if they believe directors are not acting in the best interests of the corporation.
    • Members are given greater access to financial records.
    • Directors and officers are required to disclose a conflict of interest in certain circumstances.
    • Directors are subject to a statutory duty of care requiring them to act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the corporation, and to exercise reasonable care, diligence, and skill that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in comparable circumstances. Directors have a “reasonable diligence defence” available to protect them from liability in certain circumstances where they exercised the care, diligence and skill that a reasonably prudent person would have exercised in comparable circumstances, including reliance on certain:

a) Financial statements;

b) Interim or other financial reports;

c) Reports or advice of an officer or employee of the corporation; or

d) Reports of a lawyer, accountant, engineer, appraiser, or other person whose profession lends credibility to a statement made by them.

  • There is a distinction between public benefit corporations and other not-for-profit corporations. “Public benefit corporations” are defined as:
    • a charitable corporation; or
    • a non-charitable corporation that receives more than $10,000 or other prescribed amount in a financial year:

i) in the form of donations or gifts from persons who are not members, directors, officers or employees of the corporation; or

ii) in the form of grants or similar financial assistance from the federal government or a provincial or municipal government or an agency of any such government.

  • Not-for-profit corporations can earn a “profit” through commercial activities, as long as the “profit” is reinvested to support the corporation’s not-for-profit purposes. If any of the corporation’s purposes are of a commercial nature, the articles must state that the commercial purpose is intended only to advance or support one or more of the non-profit purposes of the corporation.  However, not-for-profit corporations may be subject to restrictions on their activities pursuant to other legislation, like the Income Tax Act.
  • By-laws can permit for voting by mail, telephone, or electronic means in addition to or instead of voting by proxy.
  • A member of a corporation may appoint a proxy holder if permitted by the articles or by-laws of the corporation.
  • A corporation is required to have at least one class of voting members. Every member has one vote at a member’s meeting unless otherwise specified in the organization’s articles.  A corporation that has two or more classes or groups of members must set this out in their articles instead of their by-laws.  The by-laws must set out the conditions for membership.
  • Under certain circumstances, corporations do not always have to include a member’s proposal in meeting notices.
  • The new “review engagement” process for reviewing the corporation’s financial records is available to certain corporations based on their revenue per financial year and whether or not it is a public benefit corporation. The review engagement process is less extensive than an audit and therefore generally less expensive.  In some cases, neither an audit nor a review engagement process will be required.
Type of Corporation Amount of Revenue Per Financial Year Type of Financial Review
Public benefit corporation $100,000 or less Waive*
Public benefit corporation More than $100,000 but less than $500,000 Review engagement*
Public benefit corporation $500,000 or more Audit
Non-public benefit corporation $500,000 or less Waive*
Non-public benefit corporation More than $500,000 Review engagement*
* An extraordinary resolution is required to waive an audit or to waive both an audit and review engagement.  An extraordinary resolution requires approval from at least 80% of the votes cast at a special members’ meeting where there are enough members to take a vote or if all voting members consent in writing

In Our View

Not-for-profit corporations should familiarize themselves with the new legislation and their obligations under it.  They should also review and update their documents before the expiry of the three-year transition period.

The government has prepared a number of resources to provide corporations with information and guidance in relation to the new legislation, including:

For more information, please contact Raquel Chisholm at 613-940-2755 or Céline Delorme at 613-940-2763.

Related Articles

Ontario Court of Appeal Finds Settlement Documents Released Employee’s Entitlement to Vested Stocks

In Preston v. Cervus Equipment Corporation, 2024 ONCA 804, the Court of Appeal for Ontario found that Minutes of Settlement…

Ontario Introduces Bill 229, Working for Workers Six Act, 2024

On November 27, 2024, the Ontario government introduced Bill 229, Working for Workers Six Act, 2024 (“Bill 229”). If passed,…

Ontario Superior Court Upholds “ESA-Only” Termination Provision

In Bertsch v. Datastealth Inc., 2024 ONSC 5593, the Ontario Superior Court found that a termination provision limiting an employee’s…