Sabrina’s Law, 2005 passed by Legislative Assembly

On May 16, 2005, the Ontario Legislative Assembly passed Bill 3, a private member’s bill sponsored by Liberal MLA David Levac. Sabrina’s Law, 2005 is named after Sabrina Shannon, a 13-year old student from Pembroke with a severe dairy allergy who died after eating french fries containing traces of cheese from her school’s cafeteria. The law, which imposes new duties on Ontario school boards, is the first of its kind in Canada.


Under the new law, school boards will be required to have policies to deal with students at risk of anaphylaxis, defined as “a severe systemic allergic reaction which can be fatal, resulting in circulatory collapse or shock”. The policies must be in place by January 1, 2006. Anaphylactic policies must contain

  • strategies that reduce the risk of exposure to anaphylactic causative agents;
  • a communication plan for disseminating information about life-threatening allergies;
  • regular training for employees and others who are in regular contact with students about how to deal with life-threatening allergies;
  • a requirement that school principals develop an individual plan for each student who has an anaphylactic allergy;
  • a requirement that school principals ensure that, upon registration, parents, guardians and students are asked to supply information about any life-threatening allergies; and
  • a requirement that school principals maintain a file for each anaphylactic student.

The individual plan for students with an anaphylactic allergy must include details about the type of allergy, monitoring and avoidance strategies and appropriate treatment, a readily accessible emergency procedure for the student, and storage for epinephrine auto-injectors if necessary.


School board employees may be preauthorized to administer medication or supervise a student while the student takes medication in response to an anaphylactic reaction, if the school has current treatment information and the consent of the parent, guardian or student. It is the obligation of the parent, guardian or student to ensure that the information in the student’s file is kept current and includes the medication that the student is taking.

If an employee has reason to believe that a student is experiencing an anaphylactic reaction, the employee may administer an epinephrine auto-injector or other prescribed medication, even if there is no preauthorization to do so.

The new law provides that no action for damages may be instituted in relation to an act done in good faith or any neglect or default in good faith in response to an anaphylactic reaction, unless the damages are the result of an employee’s gross negligence.

For further information, please contact Paul Marshall at (613) 940-2754.

Related Articles

Privacy Considerations for School Boards in the Era of Online Learning 

While many school boards in Ontario and elsewhere in Canada begin distance learning in attempt to salvage the school year,…

Ontario passes Coronavirus (COVID-19) Support and Protection Act, 2020

On April 14, 2020, the Legislative Assembly of Ontario passed the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Support and Protection Act, 2020 to continue…

Ontario Divisional Court grants exceptional pupil’s judicial review application for special damages to cover the costs of private schooling

In L.B. v. Toronto District School Board et al. (March, 2017), the Ontario Divisional Court recently considered an exceptional pupil’s…