Emond Harnden’s view on the proposed ESA amendments

In recent submissions to the Legislative Standing Committee on Resources Development on Bill 49, Emond Harnden supported the revisions which would require employees pursuing claims against employers to choose between proceeding under the Act or going to court. The firm agrees as well with the amendment that would oblige unionized employees to pursue ESA claims solely through arbitration, but suggests that the role and powers of arbitrators hearing ESA claims be clarified.

Emond Harnden is in favour of the provision that extends the time period for applying for a review of an order from 15 to 45 days. However, it asks that changes be considered to the requirement that, to be entitled to apply for review, employers satisfy the order to pay.

The firm expressed support for the proposed changes clarifying that pregnancy or parental leave is to be included in the calculation of service and seniority. However, it urged that this provision apply to parties to a collective agreement only upon the commencement of the next agreement. (For a description of the earlier version of the Bill, see “Changes to Employment Standards Act imminent” on our Publications page; for a description of more recent developments, see ESA amendments receive royal assent” and “Red Tape Commission urges key amendments to Ontario employment statutes” on our Publications page).

Related Articles

Bill 124 Unconstitutional for Unionized Employees Only, Ontario Court of Appeal Holds

Earlier this week, the Ontario Court of Appeal released its much anticipated decision upholding, in part, the Ontario Superior Court…

Reminder: New Canada Labour Code Termination Entitlements Now In Effect

In past Focus Alerts, we have discussed important changes to the Canada Labour Code (the “Code”), including with respect to…

Federal Pay Equity Commissioner Allows Establishment of Multiple Pay Equity Plans at NAV CANADA

The federal Pay Equity Act presumes that an employer will establish a single pay equity plan for its employees, but…